Call for Papers

DGL10: Fourth Workshop in Decisions, Games & Logic
June 9 – June 11, 2009

Paris, France


Formal approaches to rational individual and interactive decision making is a dynamic and interdisciplinary field of research. The workshop series in Decisions, Games & Logic (DGL) started in 2007 aims at fostering interactions between graduate students, post-docs and senior researchers from economics, logic and philosophy. These year’’s workshop will take place at the ENS in Paris and is supported by the Décision, Rationalité et Interaction Group at the Institut d”Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (IHPST) and the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC Paris).

It will feature:

Three tutorials in Decisions, Games & Logic

Each DGL features three tutorials, one on decision theory, one on game theory and one on logic, given by leading researchers. For DGL10, these will be given by:

Itzhak Gilboa (Tel-Aviv, HEC Paris, Yale)

Martin Meier (Institut für Höhere Studien Vienna, IAE Barcelona)
Philippe Mongin (CNRS, HEC Paris)

Panel discussion on the theme “The future of the Decision Sciences”


The fourth edition of the DGL has also the pleasure to feature a discussion panel on the “The future of the Decision Sciences” (TBC). Participants include:

Mohammed Abdellaoui (CNRS, HEC Paris)
Richard Bradley (London School of Economics)
Itzhak Gilboa (Tel-Aviv, HEC Paris, Yale) (TBC)

The session will be chaired by Philippe Mongin (CNRS, HEC Paris).

Presentations by young researchers


Each DGL features presentations by young researchers. We invite submissions in the fields of decision theory, game theory, logic and formal philosophy. Preference will be given to conceptual work in these fields and work that combines problems of these fields. For DGL10, there are two types of submissions:

(1) Extended abstracts for presentation session
We invite submissions of extended abstracts (max. 2 pages, A4, 10pt) by young researchers (graduate students and post-docs). All accepted submissions will be allowed 20 minutes for presentation. All presentations will be followed by a short comment and a discussion. To stimulate discussion, presenters of accepted papers may be invited to comment on another paper, if the topics are sufficiently similar. Extended abstracts will be selected by the Programme Committee.

(2) Short abstracts for poster session
We invite submissions of short abstracts (up to 1/2 page) by graduate students. All accepted submissions will be allowed 5 minutes for presentation, and extensive informal discussion time will be scheduled. Abstracts for posters will be selected by the Organizing Committee.

Submission information

For both sessions authors should send an abstract (pdf or postscript format) together with their name, affiliation(s) and current position(s) to dgl [at] rationalite.org by March 30, 2010. We strongly encourage graduate students to submit. Notification of acceptance will be given by May 1, 2010.

Important dates

Deadline for submission: March 30, 2010
Notification of Acceptance: May 1, 2010
DGL10 Workshop: June 9 – June 11, 2010

Programme Committee

Pierpaolo Battigalli (Bocconi)
Johan van Benthem (ILLC & Stanford)
Oliver Board (Pittsburgh)
Luc Bovens (London School of Economics)
Richard Bradley (London School of Economics)
Adam Brandenburger (Stern School of Business, NYU)
Jacques Duparc (HEC Lausanne)

Paul Egre (Paris)
Itzhak Gilboa (Tel-Aviv, HEC Paris, Yale)

James Joyce (Michigan)
Philippe Mongin (CNRS, HEC Paris)

Eric Pacuit (Tilburg)

Organizing Committee

Mikaël Cozic (Université Paris 12, IHPST)

Brian Hill (HEC Paris, IHPST)


Contact

Email: dgl2010 [at] rationalite.org

At the Northern Institute of Philosophy at the University of Aberdeen we will  be having a one week school in formal epistemology, taking place on 14-18  June 2010.

The goal of our school is to bring people up to speed on certain areas of  formal epistemology (listed below). We hope to bring those attending up to  the point where they have a sense of the cutting edge of the subjects being  covered, and understand outstanding issues and problems that researchers   hope to address in the future. Our target audience will be philosophers who  have a background in logic, but not necessarily in formal epistemology. We  particularly welcome the attendance of graduate students.

Here are our speakers, and the subjects they will cover:

Alexandru Baltag (Oxford) and Sonja Smets (Groningen), Belief revision  theory and dynamic epistemic logic [4 lectures].

Stephan Hartmann (Tilburg), Bayesian networks in epistemology and the  philosophy of science [3 lectures].

Hannes Leitgeb and Richard Pettigrew (Bristol), Non-pragmatic vindications  of probabilism and of diachronic norms [4 lectures].

Jonathan Weisberg (Toronto), Upper and lower probabilities, Dempster-
Shafer functions, John Pollock”’’s system for defeasible reasoning [3 lectures].

Continue Reading »

************************************************************************

Special session on Logics for Games and Strategic Reasoning
at CLIMA XI (Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems)
Lisbon, Portugal, August 16-17, 2010
(colocated with ECAI”10)

http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/events/climaXI/sessions.html

1st Call for Papers

************************************************************************
Submission deadline: May 7th.
Proceedings: LNCS/LNAI volume (available at the workshop).
Postproceedings: extended versions of selected papers will be published
in a special issue of Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.
************************************************************************

Continue Reading »

Choice & Inference readers may well want to check out Alexander Pruss's thoughts on a recent application (via Michael Tooley) of Carnap's measure of objective probability to the Problem of Evil here.

I am re-reading the chapters devoted to causal explanation of Woodward's Making Things Happen: A theory of causal explanation.  The book is very interesting and ambitious and probably Woodward is offering there one of the most complete and attractive theories of causal explanation available today.  I am sympathetic to some of the main ideas.  The purpose of this note is to indicate some potential problems with the general account defended by Woodward.

Some background first.  Woodward proposes necessary and sufficient conditions for a generalization to represent a causal or explanatory relationship.  The idea is that the generalization should be invariant under some testing interventions on variables occurring in the relationship (page 253).  This simple formulation presupposes a lot.  For example, it presupposes that the generalization is expressible in a functional form Y = f(X). The technical term “testing intervention” needs to be explained as well. Consider an intervention (meeting the conditions specified by Woodward in chapter 3 of his book) that changes the value of X, say x_{0}, that presently holds to some other value x_{1}, where x_{1} is claimed by the generalization to be associated with a value of Y that is different from the value associated with x_{0}. So, if G abbreviates our generalization we have that x_{0} is different from x_{1} and G(x_{0}) = y_{0} is also different from  G(x_{1}) = y_{1}. Such interventions are called “testing interventions.”

Continue Reading »

Eventually here, I want to share some thoughts and a question that I have had lately pertaining to de Finetti’s notion of exchangeability. First, however, I want to set the stage for these thoughts by providing some background. If you are already informed on the basic points pertaining to de Finetti’s representation theorem and its epistemological implications, you will probably just want to skip right to the section on “\epsilon-exchangeability?”.

Background

De Finetti defines exchangeability as follows (p. 123*):

X_1,X_2,...,X_n,... are exchangeable random quantities if they play a symmetrical role in relation to all problems of probability, or, in other words, if the probability that X_{i_1},X_{i_2},...,X_{i_n} satisfy a given condition is always the same however the distinct indices i_1...i_n are chosen.

Continue Reading »

Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics

Philosophy of Probability III

Graduate Conference 2010

Friday 25th and Saturday 26th June 2010

The Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science announces its Third Graduate Conference in Philosophy of Probability to be held at the London School of Economics.

We are very pleased to have Professor Dorothy Edgington (Birkbeck), Professor Mauricio Suárez (Compultense University) and Dr. Antony Eagle (Oxford) as our keynote speakers.

The conference will commence on Friday 25th June. There will be a conference dinner in the evening. The conference will continue on the Saturday 26th.

Continue Reading »

The Synthese Conference in 2010 will take place at Columbia University in New York City on April 15-16.  The topic of the conference is epistemology and economics.  The invited speakers include Alexandru Baltag, Adam Brandenburger, Cristina Biccieri, Christian List and Wlodek Rabinowicz. If you plan to attend the conference, please register (registration is free) by sending an email to

synthese.conference.2010@gmail.com

with (1) Name, (2) Affiliation, (3) Country, and (4) write “Registration” in the subject entry of the message.  We hope to see you in New York this April!

Older Posts »